call +44 (0)1273 622272
Last night, while we slept in the UK, Matt Cutts announced at PubCon that Google have finally added the Disavow Links tool that we’ve been expecting ever since Bing added theirs back in June. So is it time to start discarding links?
![]()
Barry Schwartz was the first to break the news live on Search Engine Round Table, but an official announcement soon emerged on the Google Webmaster Central Blog. You can also read an in-depth post about the new tool written live at PubCon by Danny Sullivan.
Here is the Matt Cutts Google Webmaster Help video on Disavowing Links:
Whereas Bing’s user friendly tool simply asks you to submit a page or domain that you don’t like, Google’s comes with multiple warnings and is marked as an ‘Advanced Tool’.
![]()
This is very interesting. In the official announcement, Google’s Jonathan Simon recommends using the tool only as a last result if you have received an ‘unnatural links’ warning from Google in Webmaster Tools.
In Matt’s video, he also says you should be emailing webmasters multiple times with link removal requests before using the tool to disavow the last few links. He has obviously never tried to get hold of the owner of a spammy links directory…
Hopefully, if you’ve been on our SEO course this won’t be a problem for you! We follow a sustainable SEO practice that’s all about making your site better, rather than trying to con the algorithm. It takes a bit more effort, but the rewards are worth it.
According to the advice about you should only use the tool if:
However, as with any announcement like this from Google it’s likely that Webmasters who aren’t ranking number 1 for their target keywords will ignore the official advice and there will be a rush to get as many links disavowed as possible.
It will be very tempting, unless you’re ranking top for everything, to do a complete purge of your links and try and get everything disallowed. But wait!
Think before you act or you might shoot yourself in the foot. Links are still a strong ranking factor for Google, so you run the risk of actually dropping in SERPs.
If you’re on page 1 for a target keyword, you might do much better by building some new strong links rather than submitting a giant list of links you don’t like to Google.
It can take ‘multiple weeks’ for Google to consider your disavow links, so if you submit a list and lose rankings, it will then take weeks to undisavow (for lack of a better word) those links again.
Site owners have been asking for a Disavow Link tool ever since Google started actively penalising bad links rather than ignoring them.
This is a problem because it opens up the possibility of negative SEO – building spammy links to your competitors. There’s also nothing stopping the owners of spammy sites linking to you just for the sake of it – maybe they genuinely think your site is useful!
Google’s official stance is that if you didn’t actively build the links (or hire somebody to do so) then you shouldn’t worry as this will already have been picked up by the algorithm.
Just in case, we recommend performing a link audit if you have the technical ability/ tools at hand. That way you can examine your link graph and determine if it looks at all spammy – lots of low quality links and no good ones.
If you’re an active SEO you should be aware of these anyway, but as a refresher here Google’s guidelines on links:
Most of the above tactics have worked in the past and some report that they still do. However, these are the sorts of links Google hate so if you or somebody on your behalf has been building links in this way, and you are sure that it is having an adverse effect on your rankings then Google’s Disavow Links Tool may just become your new best friend.
Just don’t forget that one day of creating something really great on the web can be a lot more valuable than a week spent trying to clean things up.
We would like to hear your thoughts, do you think that using the tool would have a positive or negative effect on your rankings? And if so, will you use it? Leave a comment below!
Image by bradleygee on Flickr.
Disavow links, disavow links tool, google, google links, google seo, link building, linkspam, Matt Cutts, SEO, seo links, webspam
Stoney deGeyter says:
As an SEO we often try to get junk links pointed to our clients removed from other sites. This isn’t always successful. So, yes, in very rare circumstances when we believe a link is actually harming a site we will use this tool. However, we also want to be careful not to disavow links that are doing no damage whatsoever. I think a lot of people will rush to use this tool and ultimately will harm themselves in doing so. Either by disavowing beneficial links or by pointing out “bad” links that search engines hadn’t determined as being bad. Well, it will now!
Use it carefully and wisely and only if you’re certain that a link is harmful to you.
19. 10. 2012 at 2:27 pm
Shane says:
it seems it would almost look like and admission of doing something naughty in the first place for the site?… but if you take something over as a search engine optimisation company that has been using completely black hat techniques in the past… it is possible you may need to resort to it
19. 10. 2012 at 2:34 pm
Bill Watchulonis says:
sounds like a setup, similar to how big “G” got many site owners to tell on themselves back in March and identify linking networks.
so No
19. 10. 2012 at 3:08 pm
scott gallagher says:
I’m amazed at the general consensus that there are some negative reasons Google has behind this tool.
Let’s face it, article marketing is spammy. I did it in the past using automated distribution software, having duplicate content on multiple article sites. Many of those sites are involved in link schemes.
I’m following the 80/20 rule. I’m removing 20% of the top domains linking to my site that I determine that don’t offer value or qualified traffic to my audience. My site has no reason to be promoted on those in the first place.
I just did a video on this topic discussing what strategy we’re deploying.. Here’s the link.
Links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zVlLJp4zhA
19. 10. 2012 at 4:55 pm
Vince Tint says:
Is definitely an viable option I would consider if I want a complete restart on a website.
By and large, this tool’s purpose is to make the web a better place. If Google wants to use the information to sniff out more link farms, let’em do it.
19. 10. 2012 at 7:38 pm
Joe says:
Cutts explained the reasons a site should use it pretty well in his Webmaster Help video. Most sites have no reason to disavow links. If you’ve always focused on quality content and organic link building then it’s unlikely spammy links are your problem. Marketers who bought links or syndicated content in article farms or other places rife with low-quality articles written solely for SEO are the ones who will eventually use this.
http://www.brafton.com/news/cutts-announces-googles-disavow-links-tool
Any content marketing strategy is going to receive low-quality links at times. There’s no away around this, really, and a few bad links from spammy sites aren’t going to hurt a search ranking for the most part.
I view the tool as a nice feature for marketers running kind of a reclamation project for their site. If you bought links in the past, and you want to rectify this then disavowal can help.
22. 10. 2012 at 2:19 pm
Joel_Hughes says:
This is a very interesting tool.
My gut reaction is that no, I wouldn’t need to use this tool as I don’t create rubbish content/comment spam etc for my clients. However, I am concerned that less reputable people could use known SPAM methods to help hold back reputable sites – in these cases you may need to de louse your SERPS :)
In general, this sounds like a tool for companies to undo the “work” performed by a recent “SEO expert” ;)
@Joel_Hughes
24. 10. 2012 at 2:28 pm