call +44 (0)1273 622272
Adobe Muse
Well well well - it seems that Adobe can’t stop releasing previews and betas at the moment!
We recently saw the unveiling of Adobe Edge – a potential future replacement for Flash which creates animations using HTML5. You might like to check out my summary of Adobe Edge (and my atrocious attempt at an animation).
Then last week, they also lifted the lid on Adobe Muse. Muse is a “code name” – so we wait with baited breath to see what the final product will be called. Adobe is currently “working with the branding team to determine the final name of this product” (perhaps the developers are fans of the Devon rock band of the same name!)
Whatever it ends up being called – Muse is a web design tool that allows designers without any coding experience to create website designs and publish them without having to look at any HTML. It’s a What You See is What You Get (WYSIWYG) tool.
Hang on a minute though! Adobe already has the industry standard WYSIWYG web design tool on its books in the shape of Dreamweaver – which has been around for a LONG time (we’ve been running web design training since 1999 and our Dreamweaver course was the first Silicon Beach Training ever offered!)
Dreamweaver was originally released in the age of static HTML pages – and has had to reinvent itself over the years to keep up in the age of dynamic database driven websites. It hasn’t done a bad job of that, and remains a very useful design tool and code editor (Dreamweaver CS5.5 also includes tools for mobile authoring – which is the biggest growth area in web design at the moment). But – to use Dreamweaver effectively to produce dynamic sites which include blogs, social integration etc… (all of which are really important now), increasingly requires more coding experience.
This is where blog and web design CMS systems like WordPress and Joomla have come in to their own in recent years. Via simple interfaces and easy to use plugins, these tools allow people with genuinely NO programming experience to set up sites with interaction and social integration. They are theme based, and don’t have as much flexibility in terms of layout design as Dreamweaver – but nevertheless can deliver professional results.
Adobe Muse’s strapline is “Create websites as easily as you create layouts for print” – so it’s clear that this product is aimed squarely at print designers who want to build websites (the tool was created by the team behind InDesign)
We’ve downloaded the beta, and the interface will certainly be familiar to all you Photoshop and InDesign users out there:
OK – so far so good – Muse is a kind of “Dreamweaver lite” with a more designer-friendly interface. I had a quick play, and without having to follow any tutorials quickly made a very simple 4-page site using a master page.
Muse also has a simple “publish” function (rather than an FTP client like Dreamweaver), which allows you to either export your site in HTML format locally, or to publish directly to the web via a “Business Catalyst” account. Including this ‘instant 1-click publish to the web’ functionality seems to indicate that Muse wants to compete with CMS systems like WordPress et al… and fill a gap in the market for designers who want to be able to realise their design vision without having to employ a web designer or learn how to customise WordPress themes.
There’s undoubtedly a demand for this sort of product – but how will it shape up against the other options?
WordPress is brilliant and simple to use – but doesn’t allow flexibility in terms of designing the ‘look and feel’ of a site unless you can build custom templates (which requires programming knowledge).
Dreamweaver has lots of functionality and allows more design flexibility, but doesn’t allow the simple addition of interactive features like blogs, user commenting and social integration using plugins.
Muse will be a welcome addition for anyone who’s ever designed a website layout in Photoshop and then thought – “how do I turn this in to a website”!
(and its a big but!)
Muse currently has NO facility to add user interaction (blogs & comments) OR social integration (Facebook, Twitter & Google+ share buttons etc…)
Now – it’s early days – this is a beta version and you would expect Adobe are going to add a lot more functionality to the product. But on current evidence, Muse is going to be a tool that builds static HTML pages – and we’re really not sure if that’s going to cut the mustard in the current market.
We’ll keep following Muse’s progress – we’d love to hear your thoughts too – comment below!
Adobe Edge, Adobe Muse, Adobe Muse v Dreamweaver, Adobe Muse v Wordpress, Adobe Muse vs Dreamweaver, Adobe Muse vs Wordpress, Dreamweaver, Web Design, who is Adobe Muse for, Will Adobe Muse Succeed
Noam says:
It’s actually really easy to add social integration (Facebook, Twitter & Google+ share buttons etc…), just use the Arbitrary HTML page item and paste in the embed code. The team has blogs and comments on the list for a future version:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/muse/using/WS105c32b1ac1caee1-74cce2a4131b5b8aa9f-7fff.html
Thanks for the write up and for looking at the product!
22. 8. 2011 at 6:32 pm
Colin Welch says:
Thanks for the tip Noam – look forward to seeing details of the blogs & comments function in future versions.
23. 8. 2011 at 10:47 am
Simon says:
I can’t wait for the release!!
I’m really keen to get more into designing for the web, but coding can be sooo tedious and time consuming! I think the full version of Muse will have some new goodies that they’re keeping under wraps.
Also, loving the fact that it integrates with business catalyst! Which I do have some experience with.
Basically, this program was developed for people just like me, and you will definitely see some awesome sites designed because of it :)
23. 8. 2011 at 2:51 pm
Sam says:
No CMS, no good. Looks like a great piece of software for static sites, but does nothing for the fully content-manged projects that pay the big bucks.
24. 8. 2011 at 5:24 pm
libby says:
Don’t see how this can be an advantage since so many clients are asking for the whole enchalada these days AND since becoming WC3 compliant is so important. I don’t like coding but it’s a necessary evil if you want to get and keep a job. Dreamweaver allows for WYSIWYG with the advantage of looking at code if you want to or ignoring it. WordPress is a happy CMS solution for most people. Most graphic designers can do a simple web search and find the html strings that allow for posting of the interface to facebook, etc. The thought of having to become an expert in yet another piece of software makes my head hurt!
30. 8. 2011 at 6:22 pm
Not aMused says:
Adobe could quite possibly be triggering a regression to the bad old days of web design with this product. No CMS, SEO, Accessibility, Web Standards – did I mention proprietary?
MM_garbage_proprietary_code
and.. you forgot to mention the Elephant in the room here – WordPress open source and free!
I personally cannot wait to see the influx of new clients looking for a correctly coded rework because their site was “designed” with Muse and now they feel ripped off and jaded for no ROI or worse, long term brand damage.
2. 9. 2011 at 5:20 pm
Bjorn (Web Trainer) says:
I have to agree with “Not aMused” above. Although I know of plenty of people who are looking for such a product I believe that this could be the start of a regression to the bad old days.
I spent a couple of hours playing around with Muse and got a small 5 page website built pretty quickly and easily. From the outside it all looks fine and dandy, but once you peer behind the curtain and look at the HTML code that Muse is generating you will be pretty mortified.
Although it is pretty standards compliant in terms of usage, the bulk of the page is unneccesary tags used to allow the page to be designed visually. This is not good for performance and will eventually lead to issues when the design needs to be modified or the content edited.
7. 9. 2011 at 10:52 am
Simon - freelance webdesign trainer 11 years says:
What a waste of time! Why oh why do print designers keep looking for ways to build websites without coding knowledge. That’s like chefs wanting to cook without knowing how to work an oven or builders building without knowing anything about how their tools work.
In general web design is a tough job with lots of areas of consideration, from browsers and support, to accessibility and standards with quality control dynamics and functionality thrown in for good measure.
I think this tool has every capability to throw us back into the dark ages of web design and is no doubt intended to lock people into adobes proprietary software and tools.
I love dreamweaver and many adobe products, but in short if you want to be a web designer then you need to do the code and learn the craft properly. If you don’t want to do that then don’t be a web designer – design something else!
7. 11. 2011 at 8:20 pm